Slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate. Jordan Peterson Slavoj Zizek Debate: Summary and Commentary

The Fool and the Madman

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

But in truth, the debate found them both in relatively high spirits. She is currently a teacher in Manhattan. Exploitation is thus not a moral failing of the capitalist, but built into the structural relationship between the capitalist and the worker. Then I will summarize the debate, going through the opening of both thinkers, then moving very briefly through their responses, and finally ending with a few concluding remarks. After establishing that he and Peterson share a common enemy, Žižek went on to discuss various topics. Žižek rightfully claimed that the populist hatred of refugees is irrational. No, what Zizek agrees to is that this has occoured in left politics, and is continuing to have a corrosive effect, the impotence of Pc moralising.

Next

Philoso

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

This forum is dedicated to work associated with Jordan Peterson , a public intellectual, clinical psychologist, and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. But class is only one element of the human struggle. The monologue itself was less focused as it touched many topics and things like , , , , and , among others; and against the expectation of the debate format did not defend. Peterson agrees that it is theft sometimes , but not all the time. For this reason, Zizek wants to call simple egalitarianism into question. Peterson seemingly has not actually read or at least understood any of the philosophers he loves to talk about Heidegger, Nietzsche, Derrida.

Next

Live Commentary on the Žižek

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

Peterson will not engage with Zizek on anything like the same terms, despite the shared interest in psychoanalysis. In other words, that we perhaps embody the virtues Peterson has been espousing all along honesty, courage, truth, etc. Should competency ground political power? Let us worry about our own affairs, get on with the business of everyday life now that, rest assured, the competent wield the power to direct us. Applause regularly bursts out at lines that sound good. Free speech, despite risking offense, is necessary to conduct civil discourse between opposing ideologies.

Next

Slavoj Zizek

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

Žižek was also critical of the liberals who embody the lie of identity politics and that Western countries should rather fix the situation in home countries than accept them. The crowd cheers when we are told that he has a degree in psychoanalysis. Come here to discuss and debate the Giant of Ljubljana, Slavoj Žižek. Zizek thinks this is merely a symptomatic treatment to the problems of globalism. Throughout the evening, both speakers stated on multiple occasions how much they agreed with and admired one another. As culture becomes commodified, it projects its emptiness onto an external cause. And he has ten reasons why he thinks this is true and why the Manifesto is ultimately a shallow political tract.

Next

The Most Important Moment in Jordan Peterson

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

Peterson asks Zizek to give an alternative to capitalism, and reiterates that he thinks the proper path forward is individual moral responsibility aimed at the highest good. It took place on April 19, 2019 at the in , moderated by. The bourgeoisie cannot add value without exploiting the workers, i. I do not believe that Peterson actually read a word of Marx to prepare for this debate. He claimed that Marx and Engels failed to appreciate hierarchy as a hardwired biological fact. Contrast this with Peterson, whose persona is deeply tied up with his projection of capability, of togetherness, even of wisdom. He thinks happiness is created by the distance between us and the things we desire, so that the worst thing that can happen to a person is to actually get what they desire.

Next

Slavoj Zizek

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

If this happens it will be awful. In fact, this is not really a debate at all, because these men are nearly identical as far as I am concerned. Should we, then, simply drop egalitarianism altogether? Other than growth, he thinks profit also provides good constraints on wasted labor. On the one hand there is a conservative reaction to build walls and separate ourselves from everyone else. Mine is an eternity trapped in a room with Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Žižek.

Next

Philoso

slavoj zizek jordan peterson debate

Presumably we will now get a close reading of the Communist Manifesto. So it is an interesting point. I appreciate the comment, however! This is at the root of pathologies, and, here, Peterson agrees. Marx, as points out, was not against consumerism per se, but was against the conditions of austerity capitalism enforces for the vast majority. The moderator has been introduced, Stephen Blackwood of Ralston College, which, as far as I can tell, is a nonexistent college. Says Hitler was one of the greatest storytellers of the 20th century. But the question Zizek poses is whether competency should be what justifies the attainment and use of political power in the first place.

Next